• home
  • about
  • blog
  • contact
  • reviews
    • bags
      • Airport Essentials
      • Airport Ultralight
      • Change Up
      • CSC Bags
      • Hubba Hubba Hiney
      • Retrospective 5
      • Retrospective 7
      • Retrospective 10
      • Sling-O-Matic 10
      • Turnstyle 5
      • Urban Disguise 35
      • Urban Disguise 60
    • cameras
      • Fujifilm X100
      • Fujifilm X100S
      • Fujifilm X-E1
      • Fujifilm X-Pro1
      • Fujifilm X-S1
      • Nikon D800
      • Nikon V1 & FT1
      • Samsung NX200
    • lenses
      • Fujifilm 14mm f/2.8
      • Fujfilm 18mm f/2
      • Fujifilm 35mm f/1.4
      • Fujifilm 60mm f/2.4
      • Fujifilm 18-55mm
      • Fujifilm 55-200mm
      • Fujifilm WCL-X100
      • Rokinon 8mm f/2.8
  • travelogues
    • antarctica
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • Greenland
    • Iceland
    • namibia, africa

Copyright 1986 - 2019 by Roël Photography. All rights reserved.

Samsung NX200 (goes to Portugal)

For those of you who read this blog on a regular basis, you will know that I am a fan of the Micro Four Thirds mirrorless system. For a traveling photographer who does not want to schlep around a lot of (heavy) camera gear with them, it is a decent compromise between size and image quality. Having said that, I sold all of my Micro Four Thirds camera gear a few months ago.

Why, you ask?

It is a great system and it has some excellent lenses… but I am spoiled by the image quality that I get with my Nikon D3s (and Nikon lenses) so I started my search for another compact camera system that would give me better image quality, especially with respect to high ISO and dynamic range.

Please keep in mind that I am not a professional camera reviewer… there are websites such as dpreview.com that have extensive reviews of camera gear. I am a working photographer and approach camera equipment from that perspective. I am more interested in how it performs in the field (i.e. can I create sell-able images with it). I’ve never been a fan of a controlled test environments, therefore, you will not see any brick wall photos on this site.


OK, I lied. Here is an obligatory brick wall photo – Sintra, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

The search for camera nirvana begins

During 2009, Samsung announced that it was going to launch their new “NX” mirrorless camera system and that they planned to capture significant market share in the first few years. After I picked myself off of the ground from laughing so hard, I gave it no further thought. Samsung made really great televisions and DVD players, but cameras? Yeah, right.

I spent a fair bit of time in late 2011 searching high and low for a new compact camera system that I could take with me anywhere. I do love my Nikon D3s and its image quality, but often it is not practical to take it with me on holiday. I had visited a few photography forums and encountered some diehard Samsung NX system users – they loved their NX cameras and were ecstatic that Samsung had some great lenses to use – and an even better lens lineup was on its way.

Could this be what I was looking for in a compact camera system?

Mea Culpa

I must admit I was a bit intrigued. Sony had just updated their NEX line of cameras and the NEX-5N and NEX-7 looked really tempting, but IMHO, the system was lacking in small, fast, prime lenses. My goal was to build a lightweight, compact camera kit that I could take anywhere in a small camera bag.

Samsung on the other hand had three pancake prime lenses (16mm f/2.4, 20mm f/2.8 and 30mm f/2), a 60mm f/2.8 macro, an 85mm f/1.4 portrait prime and at least a couple of zoom lenses. What interested me further was that the NX system had an APS-C image sensor (16mm x 24mm – with a 1.5x field of view crop, which is larger than the micro four thirds sensor) that was commonly used in many DSLR’s. So in theory, I could get DSLR image quality in a small package.

As luck would have it, I had the opportunity to acquire the recently released Samsung NX200 (B&H – Amazon – Adorama) at a decent price – it is the latest NX series camera body which features a new 20 megapixel CMOS sensor. I had used an NX11 in the past and was quite impressed with the ergonomics, handling and image quality (up to ISO 800) so I took the plunge into the NX system.

Commercio Square – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

Now, off to Lisbon

My timing for the purchase of the NX system was perfect as my wife and I were about to head off to Lisbon, Portugal, for a vacation and I wanted to as travel lightly as possible.

Here is what I took with me:

  • Samsung NX200 body
  • Samsung NX 16mm f/2.4 pancake lens
  • Samsung NX 30mm f/2 pancake lens
  • Samsung NX 50-200mm f/4~5.6 OIS zoom lens
  • spare Samsung BP1030 battery
  • Apple Macbook Air (4GB RAM, 1.8GHz Intel i7 processor, 256GB SSD)
  • Transcend 16GB SD UHS-I cards
  • Apple and Samsung chargers
  • Clearviewer

All of this fit very nicely into my new Tamrac 5782 Evolution Messenger 2 Bag (including the Macbook Air) plus I had room for a backup hard drive, passports, lens pen, flashlight, lens cloth, cables and an SD card reader. Total weight was just over 4 kg. Wow. My back is really going to appreciate this camera kit.

First Impressions

The first thing I noticed is that the NX200 is very light and small – it weighs less than 200 g. When you put a pancake lens on it, it is hard to believe this setup potentially has the same image quality of a DSLR. The all metal construction feels very solid in your hand.

I am not one to read user manuals in detail, but I have to admit the NX200 user manual is excellent. It is obvious (to me) that Samsung put some serious thought into this as menu items and camera functions were nicely explained in plain English. There was even a tutorial on the basics of photography (composition, aperture size, shutter speed, ISO, etc) which was a nice touch. Well done. I wish other camera vendors put this much thought into their camera documentation.

Samsung has also designed the most photographer centric user interface of any digital camera – and I have used a lot of them. I really did not need to read the user manual to learn how to use the camera. Camera functions are logically grouped in the menus and easy to find. There is even in-camera help available if you do not understand what a menu item does.

Even the typeface used in the menus is really easy on the eyes. There are lots of external controls and the “Fn” button allows you to configure commonly changed items (such as the AF mode, WB, ISO, etc) so you don’t need to dive into the menus if you do not want to. The camera layout just makes sense.

Kudos, Samsung. It is refreshing to see a camera vendor pay this much attention to the design of the user interface.

The rear AMOLED screen is gorgeous – it is clear, crisp, easy to read and much nicer than most rear LED screens found on other cameras. Colours are beautiful and your images will look fantastic on it. I did find it a bit bright at times, but that was useful when viewing the rear screen in direct sunlight.

There is no built in flash, but the NX200 comes with a small external flash that you can attach to the hot shoe port. One crucial item is missing though: there is no Electronic View Finder (EVF) and no option to attach one. I personally think that was a mistake on Samsung’s part as the previous NX100 model supported an external EVF.

The NX200 in use

My wife and I like to do a lot of walking when we are visiting a foreign city. The camera kit (with the bag and Apple Macbook Air) was easy to take everywhere and I could be very discreet in using the camera.

National Theatre – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 1000

The NX200 uses a focal plane shutter, so it does make some noise when in use, but nothing considered loud which would draw attention to yourself (if you want to hear a loud noise, listen to a Nikon D3s shutter go off sometime). The shutter and auto focus (AF) seemed quick and responsive and I did not notice any significant lag. AF always acquired focus quickly, even when I did some night photography.

I did find myself missing the EVF – I really do not like holding a camera out in front of me, especially when shooting using slow shutter speeds. I purchased a Clearviewer since there was no EVF support – this handy gadget is a decent alternative to an EVF at a fraction of the cost.

One major gripe I have with the NX200 is the RAW file size – they are a monstrous 45MB each. Hello, Samsung? This is the 21st century – ever heard of file compression? Other vendors have been doing it for years, why can’t you?

Another gripe is the write speed of the camera – it is slow. When the camera is writing to the SD card, you cannot change menu items until the files are finished writing. I used a fast UHS-I SD card that helped speed things up, however, if you shoot this camera in RAW, you will need patience.

Samsung has included in its newer lenses the iFunction (iFn) option – this is a button on the lens that allows the photographer to change common settings (ISO, EV, Aperture and WB) by turning the focus ring. While it is an interesting feature, I am not sure how useful it is. If the NX200 had an EVF, I could see the iFn button being of use as you would not have to take your eye away from the viewfinder to change common settings. For me, the jury is still out on iFn’s usefulness.

Courtyard at Jéronimos Monastery – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

Image Quality (IQ)

Whether I keep a camera (or not) ultimately boils down to the image quality. In this department, the NX200 (and its lenses) performs very well.

I must admit that I was worried at first about the 20 megapixel count of the APS-C sensor. It seems that most camera vendors are in a megapixel race – and I am more concerned with the quality of the pixels as opposed to the quantity. As you will find out, I was not disappointed by the IQ from this camera. Note that all images shown were shot in RAW format and processed in Adobe Lightroom.

In good light from ISO 100 to 400, the image quality from the NX200 sensor is exceptional. When I looked at 100% crops of images in this ISO range, I was blown away by the level of detail it could resolve. Colour was excellent. With good technique, the IQ from the NX200 is as good as any DSLR I have ever used. And that is saying alot. So I must admit that the NX200 exceeded my expectations in the IQ department at low ISO.

Tablet in St. George’s Castle – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

100% crop of previous image – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

High wire school at St. George’s Castle – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

View of Lisbon from St. George’s Castle – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

Archway in St. George’s Castle – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 30mm f/2, ISO 200

From ISO 400-800, a little noise starts to creep in, but it is hardly noticeable unless you are a pixel peeper. You will not notice the noise in prints.

Tomb in Jéronimos Monastery – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 640

Coach Museum – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 800

From ISO 800-1600, there is definitely noise, but if you shoot in RAW and process carefully, the noise is well controlled and can be easily cleaned up in Lightroom or using a Photoshop plugin like NeatImage. I would have no issues making large prints from these files.

Jéronimos Monastery – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 1250

100% crop of previous image – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 1250

I find that above ISO 1600, there is quite a bit of noise creeping in (especially in the shadows) and I would only using this range for small prints or images on the web. With careful exposure, images are useable up to ISO 3200. The NX200 does go up to ISO 12800, but that setting is way too noisy for my liking.

Dynamic range is decent (an improvement over Micro Four Thirds cameras), especially at low ISO, although you will have to be careful not to blow out the highlights. I find that the NX200 metering tends to biased towards underexposing an image (by a 1/3 of a stop) – perhaps that is Samsung’s way of retaining highlight detail? That’s my guess.

Angel (?) in Jéronimos Monastery – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 30/2, ISO 100

Corridor in Commercio Square – Lisbon, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 16mm f/2.4, ISO 100

The Samsung NX 16mm f/2.4 and 30mm f/2 pancake lenses were a joy to use. I still cannot get over how sharp these lenses are, especially given their size and relative low cost. The 50-200mm f/4~5.6 zoom was very good too. The NX200 did seem a little unbalanced with it given that this zoom is much bigger than the pancakes, but it was nothing that prevented me from capturing some decent images with this lens.

Sintra, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 50-200mm f/4~5.6, ISO 160

The NX200 has 1080p30 video, but I have not used it as I am only interested in still photography.

Overall, I was impressed with the NX200’s (and NX lenses) image quality. This is quite a feat given its minute size. I guess good things do come in small packages!

The Final Verdict

I can recommend using the NX200 (and thus, the NX system), especially if you want a lightweight camera system capable of very good image quality.

To sum up everything, here is a list of pros and cons:

What I liked:

  • The user interface is simple, well designed and easy to use.
  • The user manual is excellent.
  • The NX200 is lightweight and comfortable to hold.
  • Battery life seems decent (about 350 shots per charge).
  • The pancake primes are sharp, small, lightweight and very affordable.
  • Image quality is excellent up to ISO 400.
  • From ISO 400 to 1600, image quality is very good and you would have no issue making large prints at these settings.
  • Samsung has quite a few decent lenses in the NX system with more on the way.

What I am not crazy about:

  • After ISO 800, noise creeps into images, especially in the shadows. I’d recommend using it up to ISO 1600 and perhaps 3200 with careful exposure.
  • Dynamic Range (DR) is good, but nothing special.
  • RAW files are massive – 45MB per image. Samsung needs to offer a compressed RAW option.
  • The NX200 RAW (SRW) files take longer (about twice as long) to render in Lightroom than the RAW files from my 12 megapixel cameras. You will need more computing power when working with NX200 files.
  • Shooting in RAW can be frustratingly slow if you need to make menu changes since the camera locks up until it is finished writing the files. I am now using a fast UHS-I SD cards which helps speed things up, but Samsung needs to work on their in camera write speeds and not lock out the menu when writing to the SD card.
  • I miss having an EVF and I believe Samsung erred when removing the option for one to be attached to the NX200.
  • It would have been nice if Samsung had included an articulating or tilt-able screen on the rear of the camera.

Sintra, Portugal – Samsung NX200 & 30mm f/2, ISO 100

The NX200 and its lenses are far from perfect but no camera system is. I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised by Samsung and their engineering efforts. When handled properly, my NX200 can produce images that rivals most DSLRs. There are a few quirks with the NX system but nothing that is a show stopper.

Distribution of Samsung NX cameras and lenses is sparse, so only the largest camera dealers seem to carry them. Also, wait times for new products (like the 16mm f/2.4 pancake and the 60mm f/2.8 macro lenses) can be extremely long, which often leaves Samsung’s user base a bit frustrated. If Samsung really wants to become a mainstream camera player, they really need to work on their distribution time and network.

The problem for Samsung is that their competition (and there is a lot of it) does not stand still for very long and there are now many camera choices available for people who want to purchase a compact imaging system.

I really hope Samsung continues to improve both their camera bodies and lens offerings. Competition is great for us consumers and Samsung has the potential to capture a decent share of the mirrorless camera market, provided they are serious about expanding the NX system further. That would be a good thing in my books.

Bottom line: The Samsung NX200 (B&H – Amazon – Adorama) is a very worthy successor to the NX100.

BTW, if you love beautiful cities with wonderful people and fantastic food, go to Lisbon. We had a fantastic time there and between sightseeing, eating and taking photographs, it was the perfect holiday!

Please support this website! Purchasing cameras, lenses, books and other items from our sponsors (Adorama, amazon.com and B&H Photo) using the links provided on this website does not cost you any more than purchasing items directly from them. It helps us keep all of the content on this site available for free.

Share

7 Comments for Samsung NX200 (goes to Portugal)


Daniel*1977

Finally, someone does not worry "too much" about the hardware and take pictures 🙂
I stopped writing on dpreview and now I'm just a reader there.
I am glad that I came across your blog. Nice to look at the images of Lisbon, (I've been 3 times and still want to go back there)

As for the camera, I only missing the viewfinder. The RAW write speed, is not as bad with fast card, but of course it could be better – I hope Samsung will improve it in the next FW.
Anyway, once I sent the video what the difference in write speed on the various SD cards.
The difference in saving is big with old and new cards.
Anyway, very interesting writing. I decided to look here often.
If you had a long dull evening, here are some of my photos http://goo.gl/PJTJG

Roland

Excellent "review" Röel. I prefer it to Dpreview style reviews 🙂 ! Anyhow I am in love with the MFT 20mm and 45mm pancakes and I'd prefer an EVF so I am currently looking at the Olympus OM-D!

Roël

Hi Roland,

Both the Panny 20/1.7 and the Oly 45/1.8 are exceptional lens and must haves for the m43 system. If you do get the OM-D, you must get those lenses. They are quite cost effective too, so they won't break the bank.

TOM BELL

Great review … It looks a very promising system … but I use my LX5 infrequently as I hate not having an inbuilt EVF so i await the NX20

however just to say a Show Stopper … means a really brilliant

Showstopper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look up showstopper in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Showstopper (originally, a performance or segment of a theatrical production that induces a positive reaction strong enough to pause the production) may refer to:

But for the life of me i can't remember the words you are looking for …. !!!!

Miguel Teixeira

Hi Roel
Next time you visit Portugal please do let me know! 😉
Great review, but now I'm more interest on the X1-Pro!

Roël

I will definitely go back to Portugal as it is a really beautiful country, so I will let you know! I still dream of roasted chicken with piri-piri sauce with a nice jug of sangria …

DarrinW

After a long deliberation, I finally decided to go for the NX200 when my old Ricoh compact camera died, since I could get it for a good price ($560). And yes, the camera is among the best in sharp, detailed images at low ISO. I too wish Samsung had included an EVF, and improve the RAW management, but overall, the camera is good. This coming from a TV manufacturer….

I REALLY hope they will improve the NX 200 line to include an EVF and further improvements to the IQ at high ISO.

If they move forward along these lines, I see no reason why they cannot capture the CSC market (which I much prefer over any DSLR). As it is, the NX200 is better than the NEX-7 and NEX-5n at low ISO, so they have gotten something right, and they should stick with it. As someone stated, it may be a combination of the lens, sensor and low anti-aliasing filter built in (look at the Nikon D800E for proof).










  • Recent Posts

    • Cambodia – A Photographer’s Guide to Angkor Wat
    • Preparing for Antarctica
    • Protect your gear from humidity – Silica Gel Packs
    • Fujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 LM R OIS
    • Scoresby Sund, Greenland
  • Categories

  • Archives